Why we need EarthCare Professionals NOW
- Morgan Laubach
- Oct 31
- 9 min read
Updated: Nov 11

We're living through a convergence that may not repeat itself.
On one side, ecosystems are collapsing at a pace that would have seemed unthinkable a generation ago. On the other, more people than ever before are waking up to their role in either perpetuating that collapse or participating in repair.
And caught in the middle are the practitioners who have the knowledge, the skills, and the drive to bridge that gap - but who are leaving the field in droves because no one ever taught them how to make the work sustainable.
This isn't hyperbole. The numbers tell a stark story, and so do the practitioners themselves.
The Crisis Has Reached Critical Mass
Habitat loss, species extinction, and climate disruption are no longer abstract future threats. They're the daily reality of every landscape, every watershed, every backyard. Industrial agriculture has stripped soil of life. Suburban development has fragmented ecosystems into isolated patches. Conventional landscaping practices - the very industry tasked with caring for land - have become one of the most ecologically destructive forces in residential and commercial spaces.
The monoculture lawn, once a symbol of prosperity and order, now represents one of the largest irrigated crops in the United States, consuming resources while providing almost nothing in return. Pesticides, herbicides, gas-powered equipment, and an endless demand for chemical inputs have turned what could be thriving habitat into ecological dead zones.
Pollinators are vanishing. Native plant communities are disappearing. Waterways are choked with runoff from landscapes designed without regard for the living systems they impact.
This is the context in which ecological practitioners are trying to work - not just repairing damage, but swimming against a current of extraction and disconnection that has been normalized for decades.
Market Demand Is Exploding
Here's where it gets interesting. While ecosystems deteriorate, public awareness is surging. Google searches for eco-friendly landscaping have increased by 62% since 2020. Interest in native plant landscaping has grown by 86%. On social media, hashtags related to native plants have grown from 91 million views to over 205 million.
We’ve crossed the threshold between passive growing interest to the beginnings of a movement. People with access and permission to tend the land in their Places are actively taking steps toward learning to become stewards. Whether they can already see the path or not, their desire to reconnect with the land where they live, love, work and worship is drawing them forward.
Meaningful Market Trends
Homeowners are no longer satisfied with lawns that require constant maintenance and offer nothing to wildlife. They're looking for practitioners who understand ecology, who can design landscapes that support biodiversity, who can help them participate in habitat restoration rather than destruction.
And they're willing to pay for it. Average homeowner spending on sustainable landscape features has risen by 27% in recent years, and that trend shows no signs of slowing.
Government support is accelerating the shift. 41 U.S. states now subsidize water-wise landscaping. Utah alone offers up to three dollars per square foot for turf conversions. 30% Federal tax credits are available for certain ecological landscape installations in 2025.
Infrastructure is forming around this work, not as a niche interest but as a recognized priority.
The landscaping industry as a whole is worth over $140 billion, employing more than 1.2 million people with projected job growth of 5% in 2025. Labor demand is outpacing supply. Businesses are expanding, and clients are seeking services faster than companies can hire.
The market is primed, the demand is real, and the opportunities are abundant. So why are skilled practitioners disappearing?
The Vanishing Practitioner Crisis
Despite soaring demand, native plant nurseries are closing. Not because people don't want native plants, but because the practitioners running those nurseries are burning out. Ecological landscapers are leaving the field for corporate jobs. Permaculture designers with years of training and hands-on experience are giving up their land-based work because they can't figure out how to make it financially sustainable.
This is the heartbreaking irony: the people most qualified to do this work, the ones who care most deeply and have invested years developing real ecological knowledge, are the ones disappearing from the field.
And when they leave, they take with them not just their individual skills but years of place-based knowledge, relationships with specific landscapes, and the potential to mentor others.
Within the conventional landscaping industry, 70% of businesses fail within 18 months. The top three reasons are personal burnout, overexpansion, and lack of business knowledge. Sixteen percent fail specifically from burnout caused by poor work-life balance. Over 70% of practitioners cite cash-flow problems and client price pushback as their main struggles.
These aren't ecological failures - practitioners know how to work with land. These are business failures, and they're preventable.
The pattern is consistent: a skilled practitioner starts doing work they love, demand grows, they attempt to scale using conventional business models, and within a few years they're crushed under administrative weight, cash-flow gaps, client management chaos, and physical exhaustion. Many never even make it that far. They look at the gap between their ecological knowledge and the business skills they'd need to monetize that knowledge, and they give up before they start.
Survey data from aspiring ecological practitioners reveals the same concerns repeatedly: finding clients, setting up business basics like contracts and insurance, feeling qualified despite credentials, knowing what to charge, managing client relationships, preventing burnout, and doing the work ethically without compromising values.
These are the real-world barriers that determine whether someone with valuable ecological knowledge ever becomes a practicing professional.
The Business Education Gap
Here's what most people don't realize: ecological education doesn't include business training. Permaculture Design Certificates teach brilliant design principles and hands-on techniques but almost never cover how to structure services, price projects, find clients, or manage cash flow. Master gardener programs focus on horticultural knowledge. Wildlife biology degrees teach ecosystem science. None of them prepare practitioners for the practical realities of running a sustainable business.
The assumption seems to be that if you're skilled and passionate enough, you'll figure out the business part. But that's not how it works.
Business skills are learnable, but they're not intuitive, and the stakes are high. Underpricing your services doesn't just hurt your income - it devalues the entire field and makes it impossible to sustain yourself long-term. Taking on too many projects because you don't know how to assess your capacity doesn't just create personal burnout - it degrades the quality of your ecological work. Operating without systems for client communication, project management, and financial tracking doesn't just cause stress - it actively prevents you from serving land and clients well.
The gap between ecological knowledge and business viability is real, and it's costing us practitioners we can't afford to lose.
Conventional Business Models Destroy Ecological Work
Most business advice tells you to scale. Grow bigger. Hire more people. Expand your territory. Maximize revenue. Increase efficiency. These are the metrics of conventional success, and they're fundamentally incompatible with relationship-based, place-specific, ecologically sound land stewardship.
Ecological work requires deep knowledge of local conditions - soil types, microclimates, native plant communities, water patterns, seasonal changes, wildlife behavior. That knowledge develops over time through direct relationship with specific places. It can't be outsourced, commodified, or replicated at scale without losing the very qualities that make it effective.
When businesses try to grow by expanding geographically, they lose the place-based expertise that makes their work valuable. When they hire rapidly to meet demand, they can't adequately train new team members in the nuanced observation and relationship that ecological work requires. When they prioritize efficiency and speed to maximize profit, they compromise the careful attention that land stewardship demands.
The conventional scaling model also crushes the practitioners themselves. The most sensitive, perceptive, deeply caring people - the ones who would be best suited to this work - are often the ones who burn out first under pressure to grow. They're trying to hold the weight of ecological grief, the urgency of the crisis, the needs of clients, the complexity of running a business, and the physical demands of land work, all while being told they should be doing more, growing faster, reaching wider.
It doesn't work. And the evidence is everywhere - in the closed nurseries, the practitioners leaving for office jobs, the businesses that fail within two years, and the quiet exodus of skilled people who simply can't sustain it.
What's Actually Needed: A Different Model Entirely
The solution isn't to fix the conventional model. The solution is to build something different from the ground up.
What's needed are business models designed around anti-scaling - practitioners who stay small, place-based, and relationship-focused by design, not by limitation. Models where depth matters more than breadth, where capacity is respected rather than pushed, where financial sustainability and ecological impact aren't in tension.
What's needed is collective infrastructure. Individual practitioners don't have to carry everything alone. Knowledge can be shared. Resources can be pooled. Client referrals can flow between practitioners in different regions. Mentorship can happen peer-to-peer. Business systems can be developed collectively and adapted individually. The work expands not by any single business getting bigger, but by more practitioners entering the field with proper support.
What's needed is different economics - pricing structures that reflect true value, that account for the expertise and relationship required to do this work well, that sustain practitioners over years and decades rather than burning them out in pursuit of accessible-to-everyone ideals that ultimately serve no one. Undercharging doesn't make ecological work more accessible. It makes it unsustainable and guarantees it won't be available at all.
What's needed is business education specific to ecological work. Not generic entrepreneurship frameworks that ignore the seasonal, relational, place-based nature of land stewardship, but practical training on how to structure services around ecological integrity, how to price without guilt, how to find and convert clients who value this approach, how to manage projects and relationships, how to build systems that support both practitioner wellbeing and land health.
And what's needed is to keep sensitive, caring practitioners in the field. The people most suited to ecological work are often the ones conventional business models destroy first. They need frameworks that protect their capacity, honor their values, and allow them to do meaningful work sustainably. Without that, we'll continue losing exactly the practitioners we most need.
Why This Moment Won't Last
Windows of opportunity don't stay open indefinitely. Right now, multiple forces are converging: ecological crisis accelerating, market demand surging, government infrastructure forming, public awareness growing, and funding mechanisms being established.
This is the moment when new models can take root.
Early practitioners have an advantage. They're creating the templates, building the reputations, and establishing the credibility that will define this field. As more people seek ecological alternatives, they'll turn to the practitioners who are already doing this work well, who have track records and testimonials, who can demonstrate both ecological knowledge and professional competence.
Collective infrastructure matters too. The more practitioners enter the field using sound business models and mutual support systems, the stronger the entire network becomes. Referrals flow more easily. Knowledge sharing accelerates. Professional standards emerge organically. The legitimacy of this approach compounds.
But delay has costs. Every year spent in a job that doesn't align with your ecological values is a year not building expertise in your specific Place. Every season that passes without serving land is a missed opportunity for habitat restoration. Every practitioner who leaves the field is knowledge lost, potential mentorship gone, and one less person doing work the planet desperately needs.
The crisis isn't slowing down. The market is ready now. The infrastructure is forming now. The practitioners who step into this work now, with proper foundations and support, are the ones who will shape what's possible.
What's Emerging
All of this - the crisis, the demand, the practitioner exodus, the business gap, the need for different models - is happening simultaneously. And in response, something new is forming.
Practitioners are recognizing that they don't have to choose between ecological values and financial sustainability. They're discovering that staying small and place-based isn't a limitation but a strength. They're building businesses designed around relationship rather than scale, around capacity rather than growth metrics, around collective support rather than individual struggle.
This isn't a movement toward compromise or half-measures. It's a recognition that ecological work requires business models built on different principles entirely - principles that honor both the land's needs and the practitioner's need to make a living.
For those building their ecological knowledge, resources are emerging to support that foundation. For those ready to step into professional practice, training and collective infrastructure are being developed specifically for this work. For those unsure where they fit, pathways are being created to help people identify what they need and what's possible.
The opportunity isn't just to do ecological work. The opportunity is to do it sustainably, with support, within a model that actually works long-term. And the opportunity exists right now.
If this resonates with you, there are a few places to start:
Still building your ecological skills and knowledge?
→ Explore the EarthCare Library for DIY resources, guides, and foundational training to support your learning.
Ready to step into this work professionally?
→ Get our FREE EarthCare Code of Ethics Guide and align your land-based work with practical ethical standards that actually heal the planet.
→ Learn about the EarthCare Professional Certificate Training - a comprehensive program designed to bridge ecological knowledge and viable livelihood, with ongoing collective support.
Not seeing what you need here?
→ Take this brief survey to share where you are and what would help most. As a thank-you, you'll receive our Site Visit Checklist and a 10-minute training on how to use it with your clients, even if you’ve never done this before.





Comments